Contains Spoilers.
Ask me a year ago
whether a frankenstein-esque film such as this had a place on my oh so precious
zombie only blog and I'd have shook my head, resolutely quoting my ideological
stance that zombie equals reanimated dead and definitely not resurrected and alive.
Today I'm a little more relaxed, my naive dogmatic definitions shaped in the
post Romero era have crumbled a little and while I still hold to notion zombies
and deadness is immutable I'm a little
more amenable to whether a lack of pulse is strictly necessary.

It's time we
mentioned Jimmy (Warren Hull) and Nancy (Marguerite Churchill), two medical
assistants who happened to see everything. Despite being threatened to keep
quiet they confess all and
though they're too late to save Ellman, Nolan makes sure of that, there is a
plan B. B stands for Dr. Evan Beaumont (Edmund Gwenn), their boss, who is researching artificial hearts and resuscitation, and because of the great injustice that now appears to have been
befallen Ellman agrees with the district attorney and prison warden that it's
worth a shot to see if he can be brought back to life.
Director Michael Curtiz depiction of Ellman being brought back to life is sophisticated, modern and understated. Yes there's vials bubbling and electric currents but there's no clap of thunder, hunchbacks pulling levers or screams. The
reanimation sequence is clean, scientific and open; indeed Karloff himself was
vocal about distancing the cinematic experience to Frankenstein which he filmed
five years earlier. There's no stitching together of human pieces and Ellman
comes back alive as if waking from a deep sleep to a cheque for $500,000
compensation, his picture in the paper and a guardian to help him back on his feet. So why am I reviewing this? Because the Ellman resurrected is not
the Ellman who died.

It's a hard and
strange one to interpret. There are hints of the old Ellman; he can still play
piano, but what has returned, if it is Ellman at all is entirely focused on
retribution. One by one he confronts each racketeer asking them "why did
you have me killed?" and rather than taking the cheap and easy option
portraying him as some knife wielding murderer out for revenge, Curtiz instead
portrays Ellman as some untouchable innocent who holds some stark mirror up to
the souls of those who caused his death. There's an 'It's a Wonderful Life /
Christmas Carol' feel, and it's more subtle and more coherent. Ellman isn't a
monster; he's the question, and the omnipotent knowledge and truth the
murderers can't escape. Trigger falls back
shooting himself, Blackstone runs away into an oncoming train, Merit has a
heart attack then falls out his bedroom window; each racketeers' reaction to
being confronted is different, some even try to mount an offensive first, but
each of their deaths seems inevitable and self afflicted, as if Ellman is now
some angel of justice obeying some grand design.

The Walking Dead is
a delightful piece of cinema. It's beautifully shot with a great script, great
score by Bernhard Kaun with believable sets and confident first rate acting.
The story of Ellman is poignant and tragic with a beautiful ambiguity that leaves
quite many unanswered questions, but no sense of being cheated. One of the best
films I've seen from the 1930's The Walking Dead is a delightful, almost
contemporary horror that never feels as old as it is and it's thoroughly
recommended, 8/10.
Steven@WTD.
Thanks ever so much, this is really appreciated! I'll see about passing it on :)
ReplyDelete