Showing posts with label zombie-tiger. Show all posts
Showing posts with label zombie-tiger. Show all posts

Wednesday, 10 August 2016

Zoombies - review

2016 (USA)


Contains spoilers.

Zoombies is not a good film. In fact I'd be happy to argue that it's possibly the worst film I've looked at with a lazy nonsensical story, laughably bad effects and a general eye for detail Ed Wood would have been proud of. The Asylum are certainly setting themselves up as a modern day Troma willing to churn out any and all audaciously ridiculous idea as cheaply and amateurishly as possible. Actually that's not quite accurate and a little disingenuous to Troma; with Troma one at least feels there's some passion and pride in the all stupidity. With The Asylum one increasingly feels that not giving a damn is part of the process and that somehow actually not going to any lengths to hide production incompetence is best practice. One can also argue however, that you know exactly what you're getting when you sit down with a The Asylum 'straight to DVD'. For as bad as it will be, and it will be, just perhaps there's a small part of you that will embrace the chaos; will laugh as earnest actors sincerely try to make it work; and as a viewing party, as The Asylum films are not meant to be watched unaccompanied; support will be required; savour each and every new unashamedly cheap and awful idea and its delivery.

Everything you need to know about director Glenn Miller's Zoombies is delivered in the first ten minutes. There's an unopened zoo, some plucky kids on a zoology college internship, some earnest staff lead by Dr. Ellen Rogers (Kim Nielson), a man in a gorilla suit and some unknown highly contagious inter-species zombie virus. Let hilarity commence. Not that it probably matters but there's no real attempt at making the outbreak coherent or logical; some monkeys are sick, one has seizure, goes into cardiac arrest is given some epinephrine or something and comes back to life (we know this as the heart monitor that was never on the monkey starts beeping) as a rabid homicidal little shit on the extreme offensive. It's to the point, visceral and entertaining, if for all the wrongs reasons. Things soon escalate, as is the zombie way, with the addition of five or so other monkeys released from their cages and also inexplicably infected; there's screaming, killing and copious quantities of awfully fake CG blood and before you can say Sharknado 5, zoo security respond to the alarm, break the carefully controlled quarantine and let the carnage spill out to the rest of the zoo.

The film ultimately becomes one of cat and mouse; or what-ever painfully awful CG or prosthetic zombie animal insanity all involved best thought should drive the next round of hiding, screaming and falling over, and an ever-decreasing number of exaggerated disparate ill-suited Jurassic Park-esque survivors. There is an attempt at a larger narrative; of saving the world by stopping virus from reaching the aviary but this just leads to more confusion and head scratching; as wouldn't there be native birds around the park? And also I thought for a moment there would be some deeper narrative with the trio of Dr. Ellen Rogers, her daughter Thea (La La Nestor) and Kifo the Cross River Gorilla comically performed by Ivan Djurovic and some possible cure or empathetic break-through but any and all notions here were quickly dropped. In many ways Zoombies once it got going played it remarkably safe and dare I say, especially in the second half a tad derivative. Always silly, but always a tad lazy and obvious.

As said, if I was to stop, dissect and critique the film in any coherent or meaningful way things would soon turn ugly. Each and every scene always had one moment that flied in the face of logic and reason, and there were so many jaw dropping moments of disruptive cohesion with one scene directly contradicting the one before, that it would be easy to dismiss the whole thing as insulting and farcical. Even the virus itself asks more questions than it answers; like why it should be able to so quickly and virulently transfer between such differing species, yet leave humans unaffected? As I say though, looking at the film this way is nothing but an exercise in frustration and futility, though maybe there's another.

Sure it's laughably bad, sure it has CG effects that make your eyes bleed and a story that falls apart as soon as you give it any thought, but you know what; throughout the film I increasingly found myself looking forward to the next comedy star-trek bridge fall or unbelievable zombie animal. Whether it was the hilarious glass tapping parrots, the preposterous gorilla, the CG elephant ride, or even the intern falling hundreds of feet to his large explosive death; Miller does manage to somehow tap into that so bad it's good experience that it's almost impossible not to find some enjoyment. Also the main actors do a commendable job, able to not only retain straight faces but actually make the audience believe in them and give a damn as they face down each increasingly absurd situation. Look, I'm never going to say Zoombies is a good film, nor one I'd even recommend, but as a throwaway frivolous extremely silly and self-deprecating beer fuelled party flick perhaps there's enough to warrant a look - 4/10.

Steven@WTD.

Wednesday, 10 July 2013

Zombie Apocalypse - review

2011 (UK / USA)


Contains mild spoilers.

Well somebody got the big bumper book of derivative zombie tropes for their birthday didn't they? A low budget Syfy/The Asylum co production Zombie Apocalypse is a no messing about, as straightforward as you can get zombie survival story, interweaving several groups of desperate men and woman as they overcome hordes of the undead to reach a fabled nirvana that they believe to be free from threat. It sounds great on paper; there's no tricks or gimmicks just good old fashioned survivors vs zombies, and it's a welcome sight, but there's a problem. In playing it so safe, the result is probably the most derivative, bland collection of ideas I've yet seen, not helped with having mediocre characters, bad acting and amateurish effects and production.

In an opening sequence ripped straight from Dawn of the Dead 2004, we're introduced to the world. We learn that virus VM2 has conquered the globe. Eventually reaching US soil it has eliminated 90% of the population and to combat this a desperate military has thrown everything at it, including EMP orbital nukes to disable the countries electronics. Now I'm no expert but wouldn't disabling  all electrics, i.e. cars, communications, missile guidance systems kind of hinder those left alive and kind of give mindless zombie flesh eaters a bit of a boost? Still it's a handy plot tool to explain the lack of technological solutions used in the film...

Anyhow, out of this post apocalyptic graveyard we meet our main three survivors. Ramona (Taryn Manning), Billie (Eddie Steeples), and Kevin (Gerald Webb) who explain in a conversation very much engineered to fill us the viewer in, that they have been holed up in a nearby safe house for six months, but have had to leave to find food and hopefully some answers. Totally unprepared (as if this is their first zombie encounter), they get attacked and mostly saved by a second more worldly wise gang consisting of Henry (Ving Rhames), Julian (Johnny Pacar), Cassie (Lesley-Ann Brandt), and Mack (Gary Weeks). This group then proceeds to inform them, handily for us viewers again, on all the finer details of the threat they're facing, how to combat them and where they ought to be heading.

The group then journeys from one derivative location another, each time encountering and fighting the same old zombie horde (literally, as I swear I saw the same extras time and again) before being pushed on. And that's the plot in a nut shell. Often survival stories attain greatness not from the story or backdrop though but, from the intensity of their relationship and their interactions. I'll say this, if there is any depth or complexity to these guys they've managed to hide it well. I think we learn Cassie is married and thinks her husband might still be alive and, err, well, I think that covers it. They're the most derivative, shallow and unexciting bunch you're ever likely to encounter. Conversation is tedious and obvious and I honestly think if I'd have ended up with these guys I'd have ended up screaming all the time. On paper it's not a bad bunch of actors too but their screen rapport whether it's entirely the banal script and dialogue just never gets interesting or exciting.

I'll commend Zombie Apocalypse for not mucking about though as our undead friends make an early appearance and the zombie vs. survivors action sequences make up a good deal of the film.  For all the action though, it's all still a bit safe and unassuming and there's never any real flare for the dramatic. With zombies streaming in, time and again on mass and often in tight claustrophobic environments you never feel there's any real danger and there's certainly very little tension. Survivors get swarmed but seem to have time to push, chop and shoot and when they do get caught out it ends up feeling very orchestrated like it was time for that particular character to die.

Like everything else the zombies aren't great if I'm honest. Even putting aside the poor effects which varies from obvious masks and self applied make-up the behaviour and style of the zombies seems to be a right mish-mash of genres and ideas without any continuity or uniformity. They try to explain it all in character dialogue, how there are older Romero style shamblers, and newer more sprightly Danny Boyle runners,  but it just comes across as a mess and the feeling Nick Lyon just said 'move like a zombie' and each extra make it up for themselves. At some point though they obviously felt the need to add something to spice it all up and included first a fight with a big zombie brute/crap RE Executioner copy that bounced about comically then later something from Kinectimals but animated back in the 70s. Proving you can't please all people all of the time too, and despite me picking up that I liked this film for its lack of gimmicks I actually enjoyed both these scenes too much, or maybe they just woke me up. I'll quickly mention the CGI too. It's overdone, always obvious and really very bad.

I didn't expect much going in to Zombie Apocalypse and despite me tearing it apart I actually liked it more than I thought I would. I thought it would be really crap and in truth it's merely a bit rubbish. Totally derivative and stale, I can't really recommend it, 4/10.

Steven@WTD.