2008 (USA)
Contains
mild spoilers.
Three years on the
from fourth big budget instalment in George Romero's Dead series, Diary of the
Dead is an altogether different kettle of fish. Gone is the backing of a big
studio and lavish budget that comes with it, and what we're left with is a tighter,
more personal story focused on a small band of survivors attempting to make
sense of a world falling apart. Produced by Romero-Grunwald Productions, formed
by Romero and his friend Peter GrunwaldIt, and filmed in four months with a
modest budget of around $2m, Diary of the Dead is not only a return to the
franchises roots in terms of scale but also a return to the zombie origin
story; following the outbreak as it first unfolds. Romero called this film 'a
rejigging of the myth' and a break from the previous four films which followed
(albeit loosely) a linear timeline.

Romero has always imbued his Dead films full of the particular zeitgeist of the time. Mass consumerism,
racism, state control have all appeared to help shape and define his previous
offerings and here in the late 2000s he has turned his attention to the power of communication in the modern age. The film looks at how the perceived power of controlling the message is transitioning from the state and mainstream media
machine to the internet and personal bloggers who can cut through the propaganda to
provide genuine personal accounts without distorting the story. Romero always likes
to take the stance that the individual whether it's against an authoritarian
state or repressive ideology will always eventually come to question the
status-quo and force, or evolve a way to break free from it. The zombies are
always the metaphor of this control and the survivors are always a mix of those
who unconditionally accept what they're
being told or how they're being told to live, or are struggling and actively
fighting against it.

It's Romero and we
know what we're going to get from our undead friends and as one watches the zombies arrive on mass to swarm the barn or broken down camper van you could easily think you watching his first film from 1968. There's no running and no driving ambulances; but
there are imaginative zombie dispatches to go alongside the multitude of genre-staple
headshots. There's also a nod back to the 'no more room in hell' premise, as the dead come
back to life regardless of whether they've been bitten, and whilst hell isn't directly mentioned, Romero has stayed true to his original vision and provides no explanation as to why any of this might be happening. Despite the limited budget Romero
employed a lot of CGI for the few more open shots, watched on by the group
on televisions and monitors. They all successfully integrate with the style of
the film and provide timely juxtaposition the claustrophobic of the small band with what is happening to the world at
large.

Overall it's clever
and slots nicely into Romero's zombie series. There are many great scenes and some great ambience but it does fall a little flat on the whole. Despite the criticisms though it certainly deserves a place in any zombie, horror, or film studies
student's film collection, 7/10.
Steven@WTD.
No comments:
Post a Comment